Monday, June 4, 2012
BOBBY YOU WONT ALLOW ME TO TAKE THE BOYS ANYWHERE OR SPEND TIME WITH THEM BUT YOU LET THEM GO WITH A PROVEN DRUG ADDICT AND ALCOHOLIC!!!!! WHY IS IT EVERYTIME THE BABY HAS A GAME OR PRACTICE YOU SEND THE OLDEST TO THE DRUG ADDICTS??? DIDNT THEY TELL YOU THEY DIDNT WANT TO GO THEIR BECAUSE ROBBY AND ANDIE FIGHT AND ROBBY YELLS AND CURSES AND THROWS STUFF AT ANDIE??? O BUT YOU WANT THE BEST FOR THEM YOU JUST WANT TO HURT THEM BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE WILL HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU!!! YOU HAVE ALREADY DONE YOUR DAMAGE TO EVERYONE ELSE AND I WILL TELL YOU KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF ITS IN YOUR BEST INTEREST!!!!! MOMMIE LOVES YOU BOYS YOULL BE HOME SOON!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Steph, did RK get tell you when the website he is doing for you would be up?
ReplyDeleteJust remember people who act alike hang around each other.
Its okay you just hang in there, it is all going to come out and don't forget what you are suppose to do tomorrow.
I feel so bad that A won't be able to participate in All Stars. He worked so hard to achieve it, sounds like somebody is being vindicative, but he did say his lawyer advised him not to go back to Amelia County. That's odd. Also sounds like a "bad decision" to me.
AC said if you need anything to let her know.
§ 16.1-228. Definitions.
ReplyDeleteWhen used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
"Abused or neglected child" means any child:
1. Whose parents or other person responsible for his care creates or inflicts, threatens to create or inflict, or allows to be created or inflicted upon such child a physical or mental injury by other than accidental means, or creates a substantial risk of death, disfigurement or impairment of bodily or mental functions, including, but not limited to, a child who is with his parent or other person responsible for his care either (i) during the manufacture or attempted manufacture of a Schedule I or II controlled substance, or (ii) during the unlawful sale of such substance by that child's parents or other person responsible for his care, where such manufacture, or attempted manufacture or unlawful sale would constitute a felony violation of § 18.2-248;
2. Whose parents or other person responsible for his care neglects or refuses to provide care necessary for his health; however, no child who in good faith is under treatment solely by spiritual means through prayer in accordance with the tenets and practices of a recognized church or religious denomination shall for that reason alone be considered to be an abused or neglected child;
3. Whose parents or other person responsible for his care abandons such child;
4. Whose parents or other person responsible for his care commits or allows to be committed any sexual act upon a child in violation of the law;
5. Who is without parental care or guardianship caused by the unreasonable absence or the mental or physical incapacity of the child's parent, guardian, legal custodian, or other person standing in loco parentis; or
6. Whose parents or other person responsible for his care creates a substantial risk of physical or mental injury by knowingly leaving the child alone in the same dwelling, including an apartment as defined in § 55-79.2, with a person to whom the child is not related by blood or marriage and who the parent or other person responsible for his care knows has been convicted of an offense against a minor for which registration is required as a violent sexual offender pursuant to § 9.1-902.
If a civil proceeding under this chapter is based solely on the parent having left the child at a hospital or rescue squad, it shall be an affirmative defense that such parent safely delivered the child to a hospital that provides 24-hour emergency services or to an attended rescue squad that employs emergency medical technicians, within 14 days of the child's birth. For purposes of terminating parental rights pursuant to § 16.1-283 and placement for adoption, the court may find such a child is a neglected child upon the ground of abandonment.
That is definitely not you Steph in any way, shape or form. I think drug tests should be mandatory every month for everyone involved, don't you. And what did Jody/Dunkum base their decision on again? Just wondering. Can't wait until the website is up!!!
For the people reading the blogsite, don't forget to check out the mommygobyebye website. I think they are going to be adding some more info to that also.
Court Intervention
ReplyDeleteIf you’re having repeated problems with visitation, you have the right to file a motion with the court, asking a judge to address the situation. Courts will modify a custody order when warranted; you’re not necessarily at the mercy of the one you’ve got until your child reaches the age of majority. However, if you’re going to ask the court to deny a parent visitation entirely, you’ll need a very good, very well-documented reason. One or two incidents will probably not be enough to change your custody order, but repeated problems of the same nature might be. Your ex’s behavior would also have to be pretty severe for a court to curtail his right to see his child entirely. This usually means that he must have endangered your child in some way, not just that he’s a bad or irresponsible parent.
Steph, this applies to you. What kind of a judge (Judge Dunkum) would tell him the visitation was up to him knowing the relationship between you and your bio-dad. That is totally crazy. Call your lawyer and tell him he is refusing to let you see them (except for ball practice), for which you cannot spend any time with him. What is Bobby afraid of anyway? He has RJ in his back pocket, that's why he gets to see them. Take care of that today!!
If you believe that the GAL appointed to your case has engaged in misconduct in violation of a legal ethics rule, you may file a misconduct inquiry about the attorney with the Virginia State Bar. You may contact the Virginia State Bar at (804) 775-0500 or visit www.vsb.org for additional information about filing a misconduct inquiry.
ReplyDeleteIf Jody Holyst Fariss is your childrens' GAL she will not do what is listed below. She will communicate with one persona and believe everything that person says without investigating. She gets paid by the state to do this. She does very little work (and I mean very little) in compiling the information needed. She does not speak to anyone professional because they may tell her what she does not want to hear and then she would have to call them liars or record players. If you have any witnesses, she will call them liars. BEWARE OF JUDY HOLYST FARISS and JUDGE DUNKUM - they work as a team. There is nothing independent about Jody Holyst Fariss.
ReplyDeleteGuardians Ad Litem (GAL)
About
Guardian ad litem (GAL) literally means “guardian for the suit.” A guardian ad litem in Virginia is an attorney appointed by a judge to assist the court in determining the circumstances of a matter before the court. It is the fundamental responsibility of the guardian ad litem to provide independent recommendations to the court about the client’s best interests, which can be different from advocating for what the client wants, and to bring balance to the decision-making process. The GAL may conduct interviews and investigations, make reports to the court, and participate in court hearings or mediation sessions.
In Virginia, what does the term "reasonable visitation" mean?
ReplyDeleteEven when a parent does not have physical custody of the child, he or she is usually entitled to reasonable visitation with the child.
In the State of Virginia, a common "reasonable" visitation schedule consists of the non-custodial parent having the child every other weekend, from Friday evening until Sunday evening. A weekly mid-week visit, for a few hours in the evening, may also be included.
Holidays are divided up during the year and the parents alternate the holiday schedule during even and odd years.
The non-custodial parent typically has the child for extended periods of time during winter, spring, and summer breaks.
Oh that's right Judge Dunkum said visitation is up to Bobby, knowing the conflict was there. Wow, Judge Dunkum/Jody Holyst Fariss I thought it was suppose to be in the child's best interest. You think it is in the best interest of those children not to see their mom but okay for the one child to live with her, what is it either/or. Are you'll a little confused?
I thought he was going to file for custody of her too, that is what he told you the day of court. Oh that's right he wouldn't have Judge Dunkum or Jody Holyst Fariss and he knows what would happen - different judge, no GAL. Professionals who would say she is perfectly fine and then how would that make Judge Dunkum and Jody Holyst Fariss look. I bet your attorney advised you not to, right.
ReplyDeleteWOW - (right from this report) Chief Justice Hassell also didn’t address how the family court judges routinely violate Virginians’ parental rights. Judges continue to destroy our children’s lives by driving fit parents out of their lives. Here we have an opportunity to send Chief Justice Hassell a message that they need to fix the system now.
ReplyDeleteThe Judicial Review and Inquiry Commission
The 2008 report from the Commission showed that legitimate complains were ignored by the JIRC.
Of over 2000 complaints filed, only 20 files were opened and only 3 judges were sanctioned. Neither of the judges was named, and they were allowed to resign or retire without publication of their wrong doing.
Judges are Fallible and Human
Leroy Hassel recently referred to “the challenges that await us as we work together to improve the quality of justice for … Virginians.” Is Hassell some staunch critic of our legal system? No, he’s the Chief Justice of Virginia’s Supreme Court.
In his “2008 Virginia State of the Judiciary Address”, he also stated “that as judges, we are fallible, we are human”. Here we have the top judge in the state acknowledging that the courts have problems. He admits that judges are making mistakes.
The problem; however, is he doesn’t go far enough to fix them. Judges are reviewed solely by the Judicial Performance Evaluation Program. This program is administered “by judges for judges”. The only input they take is from attorneys, jurors, and the Department of Social Services. Why are the citizens ignored in this process?
Most hearings don’t have juries. Many participants are not represented by counsel. This means that the bulk of the mistakes the judges make are never reported. Are the citizens not important enough to our legal system to be heard? This type of disrespect is the reason why America split from England.
Chief Justice Hassell also didn’t address how the family court judges routinely violate Virginians’ parental rights. Judges continue to destroy our children’s lives by driving fit parents out of their lives. Here we have an opportunity to send Chief Justice Hassell a message that they need to fix the system now.
Contact Chief Justice Hassell now and tell him the system needs to be fixed.
Reform the Courts Now
Some people say that Chuck Griffith’s removal from the Norfolk Circuit Court was political, but it exposed serious problems with Virginia’s Judiciary and the way judges are chosen and overseen. The political process not only guarantees that good judges may be removed for political reasons but also that bad judges will be appointed and retained because of political connections. Judge Sword from Portsmouth, Virginia provided a perfect example last year. Although he admitted making mistakes and many people spoke out against his unprofessional behavior, the Senate unanimously reaffirmed him because it was still controlled by the Republicans.
The other problem is that judges are nominated by the local Bar Association. Since none of the nominees has been a judge before, the lawyers in the Bar have no idea how they will perform once chosen. Basically, you have the ultimate good-old-boys network promoting one of its own in exchange for future “considerations”. Unless they work in the same firm, their only knowledge of the nominees is based on opposing them in court or on their reputations.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, the job of a judge is diametrically opposed to that of an attorney. An attorney has to be the ultimate advocate of his client’s interests—even beyond guilt or truth. (This doesn’t mean he can lie—although most do. It means they don’t disclose evidence that is harmful to their client’s position). A judge, on the other hand, is supposed to be completely unbiased. The training for one job effectively makes one completely unsuited for the other.
Almost weekly someone else is exonerated after spending years in jails for crimes that they didn’t commit. In these cases, DNA evidence proved their innocence, but since there no DNA evidence in most cases, we have no idea how many more are in jail for crimes they didn’t commit. The judges are ultimately responsible for every one of these wrongful convictions.
The bottom line is that we have some bad judges in the Commonwealth. It’s time to stop deluding ourselves that our legal system works. Every bad decision a judge makes destroys a family. They are destroying our society and doing more damage that the criminals they judge. Since the judiciary and the legislature ignore the citizens in appointing and retaining judges, this site is our only voice in exposing the bad judges and telling our leaders that they need to choose better judges, train them better, and remove those that are bad.
Steph, check out these websites, you are not alone. It is actually very scary.
ReplyDeletewww.familylawreform.org - report bad judges
www.thelizlibrary.org/outrates/index.html
www.vacriminaljustice.webs.com - report bad judges
keep your hands to yourself bobby it is in your best interest MEANING i will have you put in jail if you touch my boys but i know more than you think i know so i will prove you are abusive this time in court!!!!
ReplyDelete