Tuesday, December 4, 2012
hello my babies i have not been on here in awhile ive been working on a new case im so sorry that bobby and cheryl wouldnt let me see or speak to you on thanksgiving i know bobby took an hr from us on a holiday week but mommie is taking care of that i know that cheryl is telling lies of why the judge wouldnt give you back i have printed conversations and that is the case i am working on now i promise you this will all end and all the people who broke laws and were untruthful will pay in court its ashame that their are sick people like this in the world but keep your faith in god and let him deal with this i keep everything between us and that is to protect you from the childhood i had as jody, bobby, and cheryl read this i hope you count your blessings because their are people out here just as sick as you and everyone had a judgement day no this is not a threat unless you are not smart enough to know what judgement day is this case is far from over and a second opinion on the tainted evaul i had will prove that you all are in this together prepare yourself for a fight because its obvious i mother different than the so called mothers that were involved in taking my children am i physco for this blog umm no view liams dad and many others you will see i have been very easy on you people mommie loves you boys and i will get you back and as the tainted people laugh n shake their heads remember who is watching you!!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your comments are mild compared to what I have seen posted about attorneys/judges/GALs on the internet. I guess anybody who fights the system is psycho. NO JUSTICE
ReplyDelete"Freedom to publish means freedom for all and not for some. Freedom to publish is guaranteed by the constitution but freedom to continue to prevent others from publishing is not." Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice Source: One Man’s Stand For Freedom, 1963
ReplyDelete"If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his case, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people he thinks he should get, rather than cases that need to be prosecuted. With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm -- in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself." Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U. S. Supreme Court Justice
For those who have been done wrong by the courts. You are not alone, check out this website:
ReplyDeletehttp://guardianadlitemreform.wordpress.com/
THATS A JOKE - LOL, not in Prince Edward County or probably not in most places from what I see on the internet!
ReplyDeleteComplaints Regarding Guardians Ad Litem
The appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL) is the prerogative and responsibility of the court hearing a case in which such an appointment is authorized. Because the appointing court is in the best position to observe the quality of the representation provided by the GAL, it is the responsibility of the appointing court to make a determination about the quality of the guardian ad litem’s performance.
If the judge believes that an unsatisfactory level of performance has been provided in any given case, the appointing court can reduce or eliminate the payment sought by the GAL for the services rendered, and can remove the lawyer from the case and from the list of attorneys eligible for GAL appointments in that court. The Office of the Executive Secretary does not have the authority to investigate or take disciplinary action against a GAL.
If you believe that the GAL appointed to your case has engaged in misconduct in violation of a legal ethics rule, you may file a misconduct inquiry about the attorney with the Virginia State Bar. You may contact the Virginia State Bar at (804) 775-0500 or visit www.vsb.org for additional information about filing a misconduct inquiry.